CyberWAR August, 18th 2009 by admin

Cyber Attack Against Georgia Blurred Civilian And Military

The cyber attacks against Georgia last year marked the first known time that computer networks were assaulted by civilians in conjunction with physical attacks conducted by a national military force.

A report on the events of August 2008 by the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit, a non-profit research institute, suggests that future conflicts may follow a similar course, raising difficult questions about who represents the enemy in cyberspace and what countermeasures might be appropriate against civilian combatants. (Information Week)

0 Comments

Socialize

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Collision in Cyberspace Is Unavoidable: The View from Chinese Analysts

read more

Collision in Cyberspace Is Unavoidable: The View from Chinese Analysts

"Reading the essays, it is clear that Chinese analysts ›

Iran will reciprocate cyber attack by US: Army commander says

read more

Iran will reciprocate cyber attack by US: Army commander says

"Iran will reciprocate cyber attack by the United States or its allies, head of the Operations Depa ›

Cyberspy attacks targeting Russians traced back to UK and US

"Security researchers at Trend Micro have discovered a sophisticated cyberspy network geared towards attacking systems in Russia and neighbouring countries. Cyberespionage efforts against either human rights activists or high-tech Western firms have been going on for a few years. Examples include the Operation Aurora attacks against Google and more recent ›

Oz-US ANZUS treaty adds infowar co-operation

"As their long-standing ANZUS treaty reaches its sixtieth birthday, Australia and America have decided to extend their co-operation into the virtual space. According to Reuters, the decision was made in discussions between the two countries this week. The extension of the treaty would mean that a cyber-attack on either country would be considered an attack ›

Cyberattack as Covert Action

"Most of what we see in day-to-day cybersecurity is not cyberwar, or the perennial threat of the ‘digital Pearl Harbor.’ Crime, espionage, political vandalism, and military “long-range cyber-reconaissance”–rather than kinetic targeting that kills, damages, or disables–are more mundane, day-to-day concerns. National Defense University’s Samuel Liles does mak ›